Molest

Note the last sentence of the page: it is not necessary,

that the act[s] or [conduct] actually disturb or irritate the

child, or that the body of the child be actually touched.

Remember the Suspect will be Titled a Child Molester.

Connected to Rapist, Sodomizers, Kidnappers, and Killers.

thought the 647.6 

to Annoy or Molest a Child did not touch anyone.

 If we are to read this charge correctly, than an incident that is watched by another, can in fact be unknown to the alleged victim, also the alleged victim is a hypothetical as a victim is a individual or plural, that have been "victimized". But here we have a speculative victim, and a theoretic incident being directed at the Suspect, that may never have known that their action was causing any disturbance or irritation. This very crime seems vague as the victim may not know, the suspect may not know, yet a bystander, who presumably witnesses a theoretic event, is given the credibility to prosecute on their word, not being the victim or even understanding if the suspect is aware that the actions are criminal, as no where in this charge is there a specific action explained which would indicate the crime, not so with any other crime such as Rape, Assault, Kidnapping, Sodomy, or any of the other charges and yet this "Molest" is the worse if you are labeled with this, you are the "Scum of the Earth", but what exactly is the act of "Molest". Annoyance so to Annoy someone is worse than Rape, Assault, Kidnapping, Sodomy to be an Annoy-er seems the lesser of all Evils. please examine the facts and comment